Research
Rapid horizontal eye movement can improve stability in people with Parkinson’s

Rapid side-to-side eye movements can help stabilise posture, avoid falls and maintain balance for people with Parkinson’s disease, just as they can for healthy people.
This seemingly counterintuitive conclusion was reached by researchers at São Paulo State University (UNESP) in Brazil and the University of Lille in France in a study supported by FAPESP. An article on the study is published in the journal Biomechanics.
Ten individuals diagnosed with Parkinson’s and 11 neurologically healthy individuals participated in the study. All participants were over 60 and were submitted to tests that involved standing still and trying to maintain balance with their feet side by side and parallel, or one foot in front of the other (tandem stance), while making horizontal or vertical saccadic eye movements, or gazing steadily at a fixed target.
Horizontal saccadic eye movements rather than gaze fixation correlated with significantly reduced body sway for both the healthy participants and those with Parkinson’s, regardless of the position of the feet (side-by-side or tandem), while vertical saccadic eye movements correlated with increased body sway for the latter group.
“It’s not an automatic strategy to avoid losing balance and falling, since routinely moving the eyes rapidly from side to side is difficult. You can train horizontal saccadic eye movement, but this study was aimed at basic research rather than practical recommendations.
We didn’t expect people with Parkinson’s to be capable of combining these two movements. Our findings furnish new knowledge of the disease, and of its motor and cognitive consequences,” said Fabio Barbieri, first author of the article.
He heads UNESP’s Human Movement Research Laboratory (MOVI-LAB) and runs an outreach project called “Active Parkinson” offering patients physical activities twice a week free of charge on its Bauru campus.
Unexpected benefit
When the researchers began the study, they thought eye movements could not help Parkinson’s patients maintain stability and avoid falls.
“Individuals with this disease have a postural deficit that impairs stability and sway control. They also have difficulty controlling their eye movements. Their blinking tends to be slow, and it’s hard for them to pick information from the environment,” Barbieri said.
Postural improvement correlated with horizontal saccadic eye movements, while body stability worsened in conjunction with vertical saccadic eye movements.
“For young adults, vertical saccadic eye movements are beneficial, but for older adults they don’t reduce body sway. Although Parkinson’s patients can make vertical saccadic eye movements, they can’t adapt [by reducing sway] as well as they can to horizontal saccadic eye movements because up-and-down movements are more difficult in general and involve a lower degree of eye rotation, hindering integration between the sensory system [i.e. the eyes] and the postural system [i.e. the body],” said Sérgio Tosi Rodrigues, last author of the article and head of the Laboratory of Information, Vision and Action (LIVIA) at UNESP’s Department of Physical Education in Bauru, where he is a full professor.
Tosi Rodrigues has conducted studies on postural stability and saccadic eye movements in different populations, such as healthy young and older adults, diabetics, and multiple sclerosis as well as Parkinson’s patients.
The results of previous studies suggest the postural control system receives both visual information from images projected on the retina and inputs from the muscles that move the eyes, which help reduce body sway.
“Besides limitations due to a disease, such as Parkinson’s, control of gaze and posture seems to vary with age. Generally speaking, the natural aging process leads to a deterioration of motor control and visual perception, among other alterations. Visual functions perform less well in older than younger people, for example, potentially making older people more susceptible to falls,” Tosi Rodrigues said.
According to Barbieri: “Combining static balance with vertical saccadic eye movements may be difficult for Parkinson’s patients, increasing body sway as a result.”
In healthy individuals, vertical and horizontal saccadic eye movements benefited postural stabilisation more than fixed gaze.
“This happens because postural control is backgrounded. To try to simplify what’s complex, there’s a change in attention. The subject shifts attention from posture to focus on eye movement, requiring more caution from the brain in order to control posture and stability so as to avoid a fall,” Barbieri said.
News
NHS to review cost effectiveness of new Alzheimer’s drugs

NICE will review whether new Alzheimer’s drugs should be offered on the NHS after an appeal found their wider impact was not fully counted.
An appeal found that the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence had failed to properly account for the wider impact of the treatments, including the heavy burden on unpaid carers, when calculating the cost effectiveness of the medicines.
Both treatments, lecanemab and donanemab, will now return to a NICE committee for further consideration.
“Today’s ruling is an opportunity for NICE to consider the real cost of Alzheimer’s on people and their families, and we welcome the decision to look again at whether new medicines could be provided on the NHS,” said David Thomas, head of policy and public affairs at Alzheimer’s Research UK.
Lecanemab and donanemab do not cure Alzheimer’s, but they slow it by targeting and clearing clumps of amyloid proteins, sticky protein build-ups in the brain linked to the disease.
While the drugs are available privately in the UK for people who can afford them, NICE ruled last year that they were too expensive to be made available on the NHS in England and Wales.
It is estimated informal dementia care costs the economy more than £20bn a year.
Alzheimer’s Research UK wants NICE to update how it assesses the value of new dementia drugs and factor in the huge additional costs this condition places on society and the wider economy.
NICE and its expert committees assess whether new drugs are good value for money for the NHS based on a wide range of evidence.
This includes how treatments perform in clinical trials, the experiences of patients and carers, and the costs of new drugs as well as any changes to NHS services needed to provide access.
When NICE weighs up whether a new Alzheimer’s drug is cost effective for the NHS, it carries out a limited assessment of the impact dementia has on the health of carers.
But the condition takes an enormous toll on families and society because caring for someone with dementia can lead people to become more isolated and give up work.
It can have a major emotional impact and put families under financial strain.
Thomas said: “Research has delivered new treatments with the potential to provide people with valuable extra months of independence, lessening the burden on carers.
“While these treatments offer modest benefits and can cause serious side effects, they provide the foundation for a future where dementia becomes a treatable condition.
“Now we need NICE to look again at how these medicines could benefit both people with early Alzheimer’s and their carers.”
Chris, whose mother Shirley is living with Alzheimer’s disease, said: “The real cost of Alzheimer’s is far greater than many people realise.
“In order to give my mum the care she needed, I moved back home to help my dad as the care was too much for him alone. After my dad passed away from Covid in 2021, I became sole carer for my mum.
“It was a very difficult period, working a full-time job, caring for Mum and dealing with the loss of my dad. Eventually I got some in-home care support to help.
“The family has borne most of the cost of Mum’s care, both in time and fees, and the family home has been sold to finance it.”
“The emotional and financial strain Alzheimer’s has taken on our family is horrendous, and I know many families across the UK are experiencing this pressure.”
He is backing Alzheimer’s Research UK’s call for NICE to change how it evaluates new dementia treatments.
The timeframe for the next NICE meetings to discuss the drugs is still to be set, and it is not certain follow-up hearings would change NICE’s guidance on access to the medicines.
But Alzheimer’s Research UK is continuing to push to make sure dementia is now a main priority for political and NHS decision-makers.
The head of the ongoing independent review into adult social care, Baroness Louise Casey, has called on the government to act, show leadership and prioritise dementia.
She has proposed appointing a dementia tsar to drive forward the prevention, treatment and care of dementia.
Baroness Casey has also argued for more funding for dementia treatment trials.
With more than 130 Alzheimer’s drugs in clinical trials worldwide, the charity says it is vital the NHS runs trials of new treatments now to understand how to deliver them to eligible patients in future.
In addition to changing how NICE assesses new medicines, the health service needs to collect real-world evidence on new dementia drugs and prepare for diagnostic tests and innovative treatments that are coming.
“Alzheimer’s Research UK is calling on the government to give dementia the same political determination that transformed cancer care,” Thomas said.
“We urgently need investment and a clear UK-wide plan so new treatments can be assessed in the NHS and reach the people who stand to benefit.”
Health and social care secretary Wes Streeting has said dementia is “one of the greatest challenges of our time” and pledged that the UK should become a world leader in dementia clinical trials.
News
Osteoporosis drugs could reduce dementia risk, study suggests
News
Gut health supplement relieves arthritis pain, research finds

A prebiotic fibre supplement may ease arthritis pain and improve grip strength in people with knee osteoarthritis, a study suggests.
The daily supplement, made from inulin, a dietary fibre found in chicory root, Jerusalem artichokes and other vegetables, also lowered pain sensitivity and saw fewer people drop out than a digital physiotherapy programme tested alongside it.
Dr Afroditi Kouraki, lead author of the study from the University of Nottingham, said: ‘Our findings suggest that targeting gut health with a prebiotic supplement is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective way to reduce pain in people with knee osteoarthritis.
“The very low dropout rate compared to the exercise group is also encouraging from a public health perspective, people were able to fit this supplement easily into their daily lives.’
Osteoarthritis of the knee, a wear-and-tear joint condition, affects hundreds of millions of people worldwide and is a leading cause of pain and disability, particularly in older adults.
Current treatments rely heavily on pain medication, which can cause side effects, or exercise programmes, which many patients find hard to maintain.
The INSPIRE trial, led by researchers at the University of Nottingham, involved 117 adults with knee osteoarthritis and tested four groups: inulin alone, digital physiotherapy-supported exercise alone, a combination of both, and a placebo. Both inulin and physiotherapy independently reduced knee pain.
However, inulin alone improved grip strength and reduced pain sensitivity, measures linked to how the nervous system processes pain, while physiotherapy did not.
The dropout rate for those taking the supplement was just 3.6 per cent, compared with 21 per cent for the physiotherapy group, suggesting a daily supplement may be easier for people to stick with than an exercise programme.
Inulin works as a prebiotic, meaning it feeds beneficial bacteria in the gut.
This leads to the production of compounds called short-chain fatty acids, particularly butyrate, which can affect inflammation and pain pathways throughout the body.
Participants taking inulin also showed increased levels of both butyrate and GLP-1, a gut hormone linked to pain regulation and muscle health.
Higher GLP-1 levels were associated with improved grip strength, pointing to a possible gut-muscle connection.
Senior author Professor Ana Valdes added: ‘The link we observed between GLP-1 and grip strength is particularly intriguing and points to a broader gut-muscle-pain axis that warrants further investigation. This could have implications not just for osteoarthritis, but for understanding how gut health influences ageing and physical resilience more broadly.’
Professor Lucy Donaldson, director of research at Arthritis UK, said: “The pain of arthritis can severely impact quality of life. Our recent lived experience survey showed that six in ten people are living in pain most or all of the time due to their arthritis.
“Researchers are starting to explore the role of the gut microbiome in our experience of pain.
“This exciting preliminary research highlights how diet and physiotherapy can act in different ways to have benefits for people with arthritis.
“We know a variety and balance of healthy foods, including fibre, and regular physical activity matter, and we’re glad to be supporting research that explores how they work to help people with arthritis.”
News4 weeks agoCentenarian study probes healthy ageing
News4 weeks agoActive sitting linked to lower dementia risk
News4 weeks agoEndogenex raises US$50m for diabetes procedure
News4 weeks agoWorking nights undermines type 2 diabetes management – study
News4 weeks agoUK government announces £6.3m fund to boost men’s health
News4 weeks agoBrain health collaboratory launches in Gulf South
Wellness4 weeks agoSocial isolation is a horrible consequence of dementia – AI could be an answer
Wellness3 weeks agoDiabetes patients face increased risk of undiagnosed heart failure
















