Research
Immunotherapy after surgery helps people live cancer-free longer

Results from a large clinical trial show that treatment with an immunotherapy drug may nearly double the length of time people with high-risk, muscle-invasive bladder cancer are cancer-free following surgical removal of the bladder.
Researchers found that postsurgical treatment with pembrolizumab (Keytruda), which is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating at least 18 different cancers, was superior compared with observation.
“This study shows that pembrolizumab can offer patients another treatment option to help keep their disease from coming back,” said lead investigator Andrea B. Apolo, M.D., of the Center for Cancer Research at NIH’s National Cancer Institute (NCI).
“Extending the time that these patients are cancer-free makes a big difference in their quality of life.”
A diagnosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer means the tumour in the bladder has invaded into and through the muscular layer of tissue that encases the bladder. The standard treatment for this form of bladder cancer is to surgically remove the entire bladder.
To improve the chances of successful surgery and of eliminating any cancer cells that may have already escaped from the tumour, patients are given cisplatin-based chemotherapy for a period before surgery, known as neoadjuvant therapy, or after surgery, known as adjuvant therapy.
However, many people with muscle-invasive bladder cancer can’t take or refuse neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin.
Others can’t tolerate adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Still others, who despite having received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, have persistent muscle-invasive disease but can’t be treated again with adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Historically, these groups of patients were instead carefully monitored to watch for signs of relapse.
As an alternative to observation, researchers have been investigating giving patients immunotherapy drugs after surgery to see if it can help them live longer without their cancer coming back.
In 2021, FDA approved nivolumab (Opdivo) as an adjuvant therapy for people with high-risk, muscle-invasive bladder cancer after a clinical trial showed that this immune checkpoint inhibitor—a type of immunotherapy that releases the brakes of T cells so they can recognise and attack tumours—doubled the median length of time patients remained cancer-free compared with a placebo. Adjuvant nivolumab is now the standard of care in this setting.
In the current trial, researchers investigated whether the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab would also be effective as an adjuvant treatment.
They randomly assigned 702 patients with high-risk, muscle-invasive bladder cancer who had undergone bladder-removal surgery to receive adjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab every three weeks for a year, or to observation for the same period of time.
About two-thirds of the patients in the trial had completed neoadjuvant therapy with cisplatin.
After a median follow-up of almost four years, patients in the pembrolizumab group remained cancer-free for a median of 29.6 months, compared with 14.2 months for the observation group. Pembrolizumab was well tolerated, with the most common side effects being fatigue, itching, diarrhoea, and an underactive thyroid.
In some cancer types, immune checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab are more effective against tumours that are PD-L1-positive—that is, the tumour cells produce a large amount of the PD-L1 protein on their surface, than those that don’t, or PD-L1-negative. So Dr. Apolo and her colleagues assessed whether the effect of pembrolizumab varied by PD-L1 status.
Among the 404 patients whose tumours were PD-L1-positive, those treated with pembrolizumab remained cancer-free for a median of 36.9 months, compared with 21 months for those in the observation group.
Among the 298 patients whose tumours were PD-L1-negative, those treated with pembrolizumab remained cancer-free for a median of 17.3 months, compared with nine months for the observation group.
The researchers concluded that PD-L1 status should not be used to select patients for treatment with pembrolizumab, as both groups benefited from adjuvant pembrolizumab.
In preliminary data on overall survival, at three years, about 61 per cent of patients in the pembrolizumab group were still alive, compared with about 62 per cent of patients in the observation group.
The researchers pointed out that many patients in the observation group began taking nivolumab once it was approved or withdrew from the study, which may have skewed the results and made the overall survival data difficult to interpret.
Research teams are already building on the study’s findings by exploring adjuvant treatment using various combinations of drugs with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Researchers are also testing biomarkers to identify patients with high-risk, muscle-invasive bladder cancer who could benefit most from adjuvant treatment of any kind and spare those who may not need it.
The study, led by researchers at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), was published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
News
NHS to review cost effectiveness of new Alzheimer’s drugs

NICE will review whether new Alzheimer’s drugs should be offered on the NHS after an appeal found their wider impact was not fully counted.
An appeal found that the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence had failed to properly account for the wider impact of the treatments, including the heavy burden on unpaid carers, when calculating the cost effectiveness of the medicines.
Both treatments, lecanemab and donanemab, will now return to a NICE committee for further consideration.
“Today’s ruling is an opportunity for NICE to consider the real cost of Alzheimer’s on people and their families, and we welcome the decision to look again at whether new medicines could be provided on the NHS,” said David Thomas, head of policy and public affairs at Alzheimer’s Research UK.
Lecanemab and donanemab do not cure Alzheimer’s, but they slow it by targeting and clearing clumps of amyloid proteins, sticky protein build-ups in the brain linked to the disease.
While the drugs are available privately in the UK for people who can afford them, NICE ruled last year that they were too expensive to be made available on the NHS in England and Wales.
It is estimated informal dementia care costs the economy more than £20bn a year.
Alzheimer’s Research UK wants NICE to update how it assesses the value of new dementia drugs and factor in the huge additional costs this condition places on society and the wider economy.
NICE and its expert committees assess whether new drugs are good value for money for the NHS based on a wide range of evidence.
This includes how treatments perform in clinical trials, the experiences of patients and carers, and the costs of new drugs as well as any changes to NHS services needed to provide access.
When NICE weighs up whether a new Alzheimer’s drug is cost effective for the NHS, it carries out a limited assessment of the impact dementia has on the health of carers.
But the condition takes an enormous toll on families and society because caring for someone with dementia can lead people to become more isolated and give up work.
It can have a major emotional impact and put families under financial strain.
Thomas said: “Research has delivered new treatments with the potential to provide people with valuable extra months of independence, lessening the burden on carers.
“While these treatments offer modest benefits and can cause serious side effects, they provide the foundation for a future where dementia becomes a treatable condition.
“Now we need NICE to look again at how these medicines could benefit both people with early Alzheimer’s and their carers.”
Chris, whose mother Shirley is living with Alzheimer’s disease, said: “The real cost of Alzheimer’s is far greater than many people realise.
“In order to give my mum the care she needed, I moved back home to help my dad as the care was too much for him alone. After my dad passed away from Covid in 2021, I became sole carer for my mum.
“It was a very difficult period, working a full-time job, caring for Mum and dealing with the loss of my dad. Eventually I got some in-home care support to help.
“The family has borne most of the cost of Mum’s care, both in time and fees, and the family home has been sold to finance it.”
“The emotional and financial strain Alzheimer’s has taken on our family is horrendous, and I know many families across the UK are experiencing this pressure.”
He is backing Alzheimer’s Research UK’s call for NICE to change how it evaluates new dementia treatments.
The timeframe for the next NICE meetings to discuss the drugs is still to be set, and it is not certain follow-up hearings would change NICE’s guidance on access to the medicines.
But Alzheimer’s Research UK is continuing to push to make sure dementia is now a main priority for political and NHS decision-makers.
The head of the ongoing independent review into adult social care, Baroness Louise Casey, has called on the government to act, show leadership and prioritise dementia.
She has proposed appointing a dementia tsar to drive forward the prevention, treatment and care of dementia.
Baroness Casey has also argued for more funding for dementia treatment trials.
With more than 130 Alzheimer’s drugs in clinical trials worldwide, the charity says it is vital the NHS runs trials of new treatments now to understand how to deliver them to eligible patients in future.
In addition to changing how NICE assesses new medicines, the health service needs to collect real-world evidence on new dementia drugs and prepare for diagnostic tests and innovative treatments that are coming.
“Alzheimer’s Research UK is calling on the government to give dementia the same political determination that transformed cancer care,” Thomas said.
“We urgently need investment and a clear UK-wide plan so new treatments can be assessed in the NHS and reach the people who stand to benefit.”
Health and social care secretary Wes Streeting has said dementia is “one of the greatest challenges of our time” and pledged that the UK should become a world leader in dementia clinical trials.
News
Osteoporosis drugs could reduce dementia risk, study suggests
News
Gut health supplement relieves arthritis pain, research finds

A prebiotic fibre supplement may ease arthritis pain and improve grip strength in people with knee osteoarthritis, a study suggests.
The daily supplement, made from inulin, a dietary fibre found in chicory root, Jerusalem artichokes and other vegetables, also lowered pain sensitivity and saw fewer people drop out than a digital physiotherapy programme tested alongside it.
Dr Afroditi Kouraki, lead author of the study from the University of Nottingham, said: ‘Our findings suggest that targeting gut health with a prebiotic supplement is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective way to reduce pain in people with knee osteoarthritis.
“The very low dropout rate compared to the exercise group is also encouraging from a public health perspective, people were able to fit this supplement easily into their daily lives.’
Osteoarthritis of the knee, a wear-and-tear joint condition, affects hundreds of millions of people worldwide and is a leading cause of pain and disability, particularly in older adults.
Current treatments rely heavily on pain medication, which can cause side effects, or exercise programmes, which many patients find hard to maintain.
The INSPIRE trial, led by researchers at the University of Nottingham, involved 117 adults with knee osteoarthritis and tested four groups: inulin alone, digital physiotherapy-supported exercise alone, a combination of both, and a placebo. Both inulin and physiotherapy independently reduced knee pain.
However, inulin alone improved grip strength and reduced pain sensitivity, measures linked to how the nervous system processes pain, while physiotherapy did not.
The dropout rate for those taking the supplement was just 3.6 per cent, compared with 21 per cent for the physiotherapy group, suggesting a daily supplement may be easier for people to stick with than an exercise programme.
Inulin works as a prebiotic, meaning it feeds beneficial bacteria in the gut.
This leads to the production of compounds called short-chain fatty acids, particularly butyrate, which can affect inflammation and pain pathways throughout the body.
Participants taking inulin also showed increased levels of both butyrate and GLP-1, a gut hormone linked to pain regulation and muscle health.
Higher GLP-1 levels were associated with improved grip strength, pointing to a possible gut-muscle connection.
Senior author Professor Ana Valdes added: ‘The link we observed between GLP-1 and grip strength is particularly intriguing and points to a broader gut-muscle-pain axis that warrants further investigation. This could have implications not just for osteoarthritis, but for understanding how gut health influences ageing and physical resilience more broadly.’
Professor Lucy Donaldson, director of research at Arthritis UK, said: “The pain of arthritis can severely impact quality of life. Our recent lived experience survey showed that six in ten people are living in pain most or all of the time due to their arthritis.
“Researchers are starting to explore the role of the gut microbiome in our experience of pain.
“This exciting preliminary research highlights how diet and physiotherapy can act in different ways to have benefits for people with arthritis.
“We know a variety and balance of healthy foods, including fibre, and regular physical activity matter, and we’re glad to be supporting research that explores how they work to help people with arthritis.”












