Connect with us

News

Hip fracture patients at risk from lengthy ER wait times

Published

on

The waiting time for more than one in three of these patients exceeded the four hour national standard, which now requires that 76 per cent of emergency department patients must either be discharged or admitted to hospital within that time frame.

By the age of 80 an estimated third of women and 17 per cent of men will have fractured a hip—figures which are slated to likely double by 2033, say the researchers.

Early surgery is associated with lower risks of death and perioperative complication rates, but with emergency department waiting times currently lengthening across the UK and elsewhere, it’s highly likely that hip fracture surgery may end up being delayed, they add.

To assess the potential impact on hip fracture patients of four-plus hour waits in the emergency department, the researchers retrospectively evaluated local hip fracture database entries for all patients aged at least 50, admitted to a single trauma centre between 1 January 2019 and 30 June 2022, and subsequently monitored for at least eight months until February 2023.

The trauma centre in question serves a population of 916,310 people in Lothian, Scotland and manages more than 1000 hip fractures annually.

Details on demographics, treatment, progress through the service, and death were collected from the patients’ case notes and the trauma centre’s documentation.

Some 3611 patients were admitted to the centre with a hip fracture during the study period. After various exclusions, including those with incomplete admission and discharge time data, 3266 patients were included in the analysis.

Their average age was 81, but ranged from 50 to 104, and 2359 (72 per cent) were women. They spent an average of 3.9 hours in the emergency care department.

The average length of time before surgery was 27 hours, with the average time between admission and surgery 22.5 hours. Average length of their hospital stay was 9 days, with subsequent follow-up lasting 529 days, during which time 1314 (just over 40 per cent) of these patients died.

In all, more than a third (1261; 39 per cent) patients waited longer than 4 hours in the emergency department. They were significantly more likely to be admitted during the winter, to pose more of a surgical risk, to have sustained a fracture that is more difficult to repair, and to have waited longer for their surgery than those who spent 4 hours or less in the emergency department.

Almost 96% of those who waited less than 4 hours were alive at 90 days compared with almost 93 per cent for those waiting longer—equivalent to one additional death at 90 days for every 36 patients who waited more than 4 hours, say the researchers.

The 90 day risk of death rose in tandem with the length of delay before surgery, reaching around 14 per cent after 24 hours.

Male sex, older age, admission during the winter months, higher operative risk, care home residence, and longer time between admission and surgery were also all independently associated with death at 90 days.

After taking account of potentially influential factors, a 4+ hour wait  was associated with 29 per cent, 36 per cent, and 15 per cent, heightened risks of death at 60 days, 90 days, and at final check-up, respectively.

Patients who waited 4+ hours in the emergency department were also much more likely to spend 1 day longer in hospital, adding up to around £770,000 in total, if costed at £610/day (2014 prices), note the researchers.

The researchers acknowledge the relatively small size of their study and the lack of adjustment for the patients’ overall state of health and factors delaying their admission, all of which may have influenced their outcomes.

But while it isn’t clear exactly why spending more than four hours in the emergency department should be associated with poorer outcomes for hip fracture patients, given that there is a link, direct transfer to theatre from the emergency department might improve the chances of survival for these patients, the researchers suggest.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Gut-friendly foods may damage heart, charity warns

Published

on

Gut-friendly foods such as kimchi and kombucha may carry hidden risks for heart health when eaten in excess, the British Heart Foundation (BHF) has warned.

The charity said foods marketed as prebiotic, probiotic or otherwise good for the gut can support the microbiome, but some may also be high in salt or sugar, which can raise the risk of cardiovascular disease.

Products highlighted by the British Heart Foundation included kimchi, kombucha, fruit yoghurts, smoothies and sauerkraut. It said there is no harm in including them as part of a healthy diet, but advised people to check labels for added salt and sugar and eat them in moderation.

Tracy Parker, the charity’s nutrition lead, said: “We encourage everyone to choose foods that can keep their gut microbiome healthy. The benefits are clear, and we are continuing to improve our understanding of how a gut-friendly diet may help our hearts.

“A lot of these products can contain high levels of salt or sugar though, so it is important to be aware of the potential drawbacks.

“By ensuring you check package labels for added salt and sugars, and eat each in moderation, you can make sure the risks do not outweigh the benefits for your heart health.”

Fermented foods such as kimchi and sauerkraut are rich in probiotics, the healthy bacteria produced during fermentation that can help support a diverse and healthy gut microbiome.

However, both are traditionally made using a lot of salt, which can raise blood pressure if eaten frequently or in large quantities. High blood pressure is known to increase the risk of heart attack and stroke.

Kombucha, a fermented tea, also contains probiotics and can be a healthier alternative to fizzy drinks, but many commercial and shop-bought versions contain added sugar.

Eating too much sugar can lead to weight gain, which can increase the risk of heart attack, stroke and other cardiovascular disease.

Fruit yoghurts can contain probiotic live bacteria cultures, but may also be high in sugar and have fewer live cultures than plain versions.

The charity said plain yoghurt with live and active cultures on the label can be a lower-sugar option, with whole fruit added at home for sweetness.

Smoothies made with whole fruits provide prebiotic fibre, which feeds beneficial gut bacteria and supports digestive health.

They can also provide vitamins and antioxidants, especially when made with a variety of plant-based ingredients.

But blending breaks down the structure of fruit, releasing free sugars that behave like added sugars in the body and can cause faster rises in blood sugar levels.

Regularly consuming too much sugar can lead to weight gain, which can increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes, heart disease and kidney disease.

The charity said only one 150ml serving of any smoothie counts towards five-a-day, and suggested adding nuts or seeds for extra protein and fibre to help keep blood sugar levels more stable.

The BHF also noted that some shop-bought sauerkraut is pasteurised, which removes most of the live bacteria.

It advised checking the label, eating small portions and choosing unpasteurised products for those seeking the probiotic benefits.

The charity said beneficial gut bacteria produce short-chain fatty acids during digestion, which are linked to reduced inflammation, better metabolism and better heart and circulatory health.

These good bacteria also help digest polyphenols, natural plant chemicals thought to have antioxidant properties and which may help lower blood pressure.

By contrast, harmful gut bacteria, which thrive on diets high in fat and red meat, produce chemicals that can cause problems in the heart and blood vessels by increasing inflammation and altering how cholesterol is processed in the body.

Beneficial bacteria thrive on varied diets high in prebiotics, non-digestible fibres found in foods such as wholegrains, oats, beans, lentils, bananas and onions.

Continue Reading

News

Diabetes patients face increased risk of undiagnosed heart failure

Published

on

People with diabetes may have undiagnosed heart failure that could be detected by a simple screening blood test, research suggests.

The TARTAN-HF trial found that one in four patients with diabetes who had at least one other risk factor for heart failure had undiagnosed heart failure detected through screening with a blood test and ultrasound scanning of the heart.

Experts said the findings show the extent of unrecognised heart failure in people with diabetes, and how the condition can be detected using a widely available blood test called NT-proBNP, which measures how much strain the heart is under.

They suggest a heart failure screening programme for diabetics could improve diagnosis rates, lead to earlier treatment and potentially reduce the risk of hospitalisation and death.

The study, involving 700 patients, was led by the University of Glasgow in collaboration with AstraZeneca, Roche Diagnostics, Us2.ai, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and NHS Lanarkshire.

Dr Kieran Docherty, clinical senior lecturer at the University of Glasgow’s School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, said: “Our results from the landmark TARTAN-HF trial identified heart failure in a large proportion of people living with diabetes, emphasising the need for a heart failure screening strategy in this group of patients.

“We know that many of the symptoms and signs of heart failure are non-specific, and may go unrecognised as potentially being due to heart failure for a long time.

“The strategy used in our trial is simple and easy to implement in clinical practice, and will aid in the early identification of heart failure in people with diabetes, and facilitate the initiation of medications that we know improve outcomes in patients with heart failure.”

The study, which began more than three years ago, involved more than 700 people with diabetes from the two health board areas who had at least one other risk factor for heart failure.

They were randomly assigned either to receive heart failure screening or to continue with their usual care.

Researchers found screening uncovered a large number of previously unrecognised cases of heart failure. Around one in four, or 24.9 per cent, of those screened were found to have the condition within six months, compared with 1 per cent in the group continuing their usual care.

The study, involving patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, found almost all of the participants found to have heart failure had preserved ejection fraction, which can be difficult to detect without dedicated testing.

The findings of the TARTAN-HF trial were presented at the American College of Cardiology conference taking place from 28 to 30 March in New Orleans in the US.

Dr Edward Piper, medical director at AstraZeneca UK, said: “Delayed diagnosis and treatment of heart failure in people with type 2 diabetes contributes to poor long-term outcomes. TARTAN-HF demonstrates that targeted, risk-based screening can identify previously undiagnosed heart failure in approximately one in four high-risk patients with diabetes, enabling earlier intervention with guideline-directed therapy.”

Dr Christian Simon, head of global medical affairs at Roche Diagnostics, said: “We are proud to have supported the landmark TARTAN-HF trial. These findings demonstrate the transformative power of early, accessible diagnostics like the NT-proBNP blood test.

“By identifying unrecognised heart failure in people with diabetes, we enable clinicians to initiate appropriate treatments sooner, ultimately improving patient outcomes and lives.”

Continue Reading

News

UK government announces £6.3m fund to boost men’s health

Published

on

The UK has launched a £6.3m men’s health fund to back local projects aimed at helping men and boys live longer, healthier lives.

The Men’s Health Community Fund is a partnership between the Department of Health and Social Care, Movember and People’s Health Trust.

The government is contributing £3m, while the two charities are more than doubling that to take the total to £6.3m.

Grants will support community projects reaching underserved men and boys aged 16 and over, particularly in the most disadvantaged areas and at key points in their lives such as becoming a father, losing a job or retiring.

Projects could include support for new fathers, activities for men facing loneliness and social isolation, services to help young men engage with the health system, and support for men in work, out of work and moving into retirement.

The programme will bring together voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations to test new ways of reaching men who are least likely to use traditional health services.

An evaluation funded through the National Institute for Health and Care Research will assess what works and help inform future policy and delivery.

Health and social care secretary Wes Streeting said: “Too many men across the country are living shorter, less healthy lives, particularly those in our most disadvantaged communities.

“This new partnership will help men get the support they need in the places they feel most comfortable, their communities, among people they trust.

“By working with expert charities and local organisations, we can reach the men who are too often missed by traditional services and help them take better care of their mental and physical health.”

“It is a key step in delivering our first ever Men’s Health Strategy and driving forward our ambition to halve the gap in healthy life expectancy between the richest and poorest areas.”

The Men’s Health Strategy sets out plans to tackle the physical and mental health challenges men and boys face.

Men can be less likely to seek help and more likely to suffer in silence, while higher rates of smoking, drinking, gambling and drug use are damaging men’s health and affecting families, workplaces and communities.

The government is also investing £3.6m over the next three years in suicide prevention projects for middle-aged men in local communities across areas of England where men are most at risk, many of which are also among the most deprived. Suicide is one of the biggest killers of men under 50, and three-quarters of all suicides are men.

The projects will aim to break down barriers middle-aged men face in seeking support, including stigma around asking for help and a lack of awareness of what is available and how to access it.

They will be co-designed with experts and men with lived experience of mental health crises and suicidal thoughts.

Continue Reading

Sign up for free updates from Agetech World

Trending

    Agetech World